Apeel: A Deep Dive into the Controversies Surrounding the Produce Coating

Introduction

As someone deeply involved in the field of human detoxification, I have watched with growing concern the widespread use of Apeel Sciences Edipeel™ (labeled as Apeel), a surface finishing agent approved by the FDA to extend the shelf life of fruits and vegetables. While the idea of reducing food waste is commendable, the potential health risks associated with Apeel demand a closer examination. In this article, I will explore the controversies and health concerns surrounding Apeel, drawing on my expertise in detoxification and the insights from my father, Dr. David E. Root.

Overview of Apeel

Apeel is marketed as a solution to preserve the freshness of produce by forming a protective coating. This coating is applied to various fruits and vegetables, including avocados, apples, citrus fruits, and more. Despite its widespread use, Apeel has come under scrutiny for its potential health impacts, especially among those of us who prioritize detoxification and clean eating.

Transparency and Testing Concerns

One of the most troubling aspects of Apeel is the lack of transparency regarding its testing and long-term health effects. The company’s website provides scant details about the safety evaluations conducted. As a detoxification expert, I find this lack of information particularly concerning. Without rigorous and transparent testing, it’s impossible to fully understand the implications of consuming produce coated with Apeel.

consumer disliking Apeel

Ingredients and Toxicity Issues

A closer look at the ingredients in Apeel reveals several substances that raise red flags. Among these are heptane, palladium, cadmium, arsenic, lead, and mercury. These components are known toxins with serious health risks, including cancer, neurological damage, and bone diseases. Even in small quantities, the accumulation of these toxins in the body over time is alarming. They tend to store in fat tissues, posing long-term health risks that are not adequately addressed by the current safety regulations.

Regulatory and Safety Concerns

Apeel is classified under the Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) category, a designation that allows food manufacturers to use it without extensive regulatory oversight. This process often relies on the company’s own scientists to determine safety, which can lead to conflicts of interest and insufficient safety evaluations. As someone deeply invested in public health and safety, I find this regulatory framework inadequate for ensuring the safety of new food additives like Apeel.

Application and Handling Concerns

The application of Apeel requires specially trained individuals, highlighting potential handling risks due to its toxic ingredients. Unlike other food additives, Apeel cannot be washed off, as it penetrates the produce. This makes it a persistent part of the food we consume, raising significant concerns about its overall safety.

Consumer Impact and Lack of Information

Apeel’s website offers limited information about its formula and ingredients, making it difficult for consumers to make informed decisions. Although Apeel is marketed as plant-based, it contains trans fats, which are associated with inflammation, heart disease, and obesity. This misleading marketing further complicates consumer understanding and trust.

Global Use and Regulatory Approvals

Apeel is approved for use in numerous countries, including the United States, Canada, China, and several European and African nations. The types of produce treated with Apeel vary by region but commonly include avocados, citrus fruits, mangoes, and more. It is essential for consumers to check labels carefully to identify Apeel-coated products and make informed choices.

Public Concerns and Trust Issues

Photo Credit: John Landis, et al. ANIMAL HOUSE, 1978

The involvement of organizations like the WHO, WEF, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in endorsing and funding Apeel has further complicated public trust.

Many people, including myself, have grown wary of these organizations, especially following the perceived mishandling of the Covid-19 pandemic. This skepticism amplifies concerns about the safety and transparency of products like Apeel.

The Importance of Detoxification

Drawing on decades of research and clinical practice, my father, Dr. David E. Root, and I have developed the Detoxination protocol. This advanced detoxification regimen combines niacin, exercise, sauna therapy, binders, and nutritional supplements to eliminate toxins from the body. Our protocol leverages niacin to induce a ‘rebound lipolysis,’ which mobilizes fat-stored toxins and facilitates their excretion through sweat.

Our Detoxination protocol offers a scientifically grounded approach to detoxifying the body from harmful substances, including those potentially introduced by products like Apeel. By enhancing toxin mobilization and elimination, Detoxination addresses the risks associated with the accumulation of toxic substances in the body, offering a proactive solution to mitigate these health threats.

Conclusion

The debate surrounding Apeel highlights a broader issue of food safety and transparency. While extending the shelf life of produce is a valuable goal, it should not come at the expense of consumer health. As a detoxification expert, I urge consumers to research thoroughly and make informed choices about the produce they purchase. The potential health risks associated with Apeel underscore the importance of transparency, rigorous testing, and informed decision-making.

Daniel Root is the leading expert, practitioner, and trainer of Detoxination®.  He is the son of the world renowned expert in human detoxification of heavy metals, synthetic/man-made chemicals, and radiation, Dr. David E. Root.
Dan and his father authored Sauna Detoxification Using Niacin that sells thousands of copies worldwide.
 
He was co-host of a weekly radio program, The Get Detoxinated! Show on KSAC 105.5 FM.
 
Dan is the CEO of Detoxination Wellness Centers, a dba of Sabre Hawk, LLC.
He has been an entrepreneur in the Information Technology field since 1989, and is the adoptive father of 3 biological sisters.
 
Dan served on the Board of Sierra Adoption Services for 6 years. He lives with his wife, Suzy, and their youngest daughter in Sacramento, California.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email